for a living planet

site

  1. myWWF Sign in
  2. Sign up
  3. Help

WWF Climate Blog

Copenhagen? (button)

What's going on?  (150 button)

Why bother?  (150 button)

What's the solution?  (150 button)

What can I do?  (150 button)


Google Translate

    Translate to:

Categories

Archives

Is our love affair over?

Have we lost trust in each other?

Is there a chance can still kiss and make up?

The upcoming climate change conference in Copenhagen is our best chance to reafirm our love for our one and only, cuddly blue marble.

Share the video and help us fight for our planet’s love!

Posted in All Posts | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Industrialized countries try to play down Copenhagen

We are now reporting from Copenhagen, Denmark, where ministers from 43 countries have gathered for two days of ministerial meetings on 16 and 17 of November.

This meeting sets the scene for the next act on the political road towards the Copenhagen Climate Change conference, ‘COP15′.

The big discussion topic is the recent news from the APEC meeting in Singapore, where a few leaders of industrialized countries continued to down-play the ambition for COP15. Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s statement in Singapore triggered these news.

What Rasmussen says

PM Rasmussen repeated his view that the Copenhagen outcome will not be legally binding, but instead would be part one of a ‘two-step’ agreement.  Copenhagen will only deliver “a political text framing the agreement, 5 to 8 pages …” with the ‘full’ agreement to follow at an as-yet unspecified date in the future.

That leaves us – and many of the most vulnerable countries in the world – scratching our heads and asking why we should accept yet more delay when delay threatens the survival of people, communities and ecosystems, as well as costing around $500 billion per year according to IAE’s World Energy Outlook.

Read More »

Posted in All Posts | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thriving in the clean economy – WWF Webex event

THE ECONOMIST, CISCO WEBEX & WWF CLIMATE SAVERS HOST SPECIAL ONLINE EVENT, “THRIVING IN THE CLEAN ECONOMY”

November 12, 2009 — The Economist, Cisco WebEx Solutions and WWF Climate Savers are joining together to host THRIVING IN THE CLEAN ECONOMY, a special online event focusing on what world-leading companies are doing to address climate change and secure our energy future while increasing their bottom lines.

WWF Climate Savers partner companies, including Coca-Cola, IBM, Johnson & Johnson, Nokia, and Johnson Diversy, will be part of an online panel on Wednesday, November 18th at 1:30 pm EST (18:30 GMT |19:30 CET).  The event will take place live from The Ronald Reagan Center in Washington D.C. with a number of the panelists joining from around the globe using Cisco WebEx technology.

Read More »

Posted in All Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

10 little things the world needs to agree on

The Copenhagen Climate conference is just around the corner and we are working on clear goals for the negotiations, a “simple” menu of what the world needs to agree on.

There are the 10 little points which will help us face climate change and start the basis of a new, cleaner economy:

  1. Governments need to create a legally binding framework with an amended Kyoto Protocol and a new Copenhagen Protocol, which secures the survival of countries, cultures and ecosystems and clears the way to the low carbon economy.
  2. Global emissions peak before 2017 keeping overall warming well below the 2°C danger threshold, going down to below 1.5°C as soon as possible.
  3. Industrialized countries commit to reduce their emissions by 40% by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.
  4. Developing countries agree to undertake significant action making emissions at least 30% lower than Business-As-Usual by 2020.
  5. Emissions from forest destruction are reduced by three quarters (75%) by 2020, taking into account indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ rights.
  6. A framework for immediate adaptation action is set in place, especially for vulnerable countries and ecosystems, including the provision of insurance and compensation.
  7. Public finance of at least US$160 billion per year is provided to developing countries for adaptation and mitigation through innovative sources of finance.
  8. Mechanisms are set up to strengthen technology cooperation on research, development and dissemination of low-carbon and climate-resilient technologies.
  9. A new institutional set-up under the UNFCCC allows for coordination, implementation and funding allocation, in a transparent and democratic way, and incentivizes compliance.
  10. Parties agree transparent and comparable standards for carbon markets, forests and land use, mitigation efforts and inventories, and ways to limit international aviation and shipping emissions.

All points were presented by WWF in the last UN Climate conference, in Barcelona.

Posted in All Posts | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Battle of minds (and hearts)

The battle of minds (and hearts) is out in the open. The numbers could not be clearer.

A group of highly vulnerable countries met in the Maldives and have made it unquestionably clear that the rich world had to make a major effort to reduce emissions by 40% by 2020 or else they would be guilty of exterminating whole nations. Small island states in particular feel sea level rise, with the Maldives for instance already having had to evacuate some of their islands.

Almost at the same time, the International Energy Agency launched its annual World Energy Outlook. This new edition was hailed (also by WWF) as a breakthrough – and in one way it is, given the fact that the IEA now advocates massive investment in clean energy while up to just three years ago, their only scenario was Business as Ususal.

But the IEA’s numbers don’t add up. The IEA’s ‘low emission scenario’ sees emissions from industrialized countries only come down by 4.5% by 2020.

That is the certain annihilation of whole countries and cultures. Of course none of these is a member of the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) which only represents industrialized countries.

So what?

Well, it’s back to good old ethical questions such as equality, human rights, and the right of development.

Do the rich countries have the right to simply kill the smaller ones if those are in the weir emission pathway? Or do their political and economic leaders have to make bold decisions to avoid catastrophic climate change and save as many countries, cultires, people as possible?

How would you decide? and mind – you cannot have both. Its bold or brutal.

MH

Posted in All Posts | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment